Stephen Edelston Toulmin developed a layout for analyzing arguments. The six components for analyzing arguments using his method are: claim, ground (evidence, data), warrant, backing, rebuttal, and qualifier.
We can utilize his model as a structure to arrange our arguments.
Let's look at the components and examples.
CLAIM: To make/establish a claim
Carpooling to commute to work is very beneficial.
GROUND: Laying the foundation for your arguement
Many people drive to work without any passengers.
WARRANT: Connection between the claim and the ground of your arguement
Carpooling can reduce harmful emissions and save fuel expenses.
BACKING: Putting credibility in your argument or convincing statements
Scientist believe that if we reduce the emissions from automobiles by 25%, we can start to reverse the damage to our environment.
or
With the price of gasoline at record highs, you can save more than half at the pump each week.
REBUTTAL: Recognizing some restrictions, limitations, exceptions...
If a person chooses not to join a carpool, they may opt to take public transporation or consider a more fuel-efficient vehicle or hybrid vehicle.
QUALIFIER: Close your arguement with force and make a strong convincing ending
Carpooling will definitely reduce carbon emissions and in turn, reduce overall pollution. Furthermore, you will be able to save over half of your fuel costs spending your hard-earned money on more important things.
No comments:
Post a Comment